Performance Monitoring Matrix

The percentage of Scrutiny Panel Review Reports' Recommendations that are accepted by the Executive and have been put into practice, as verified by a Follow Up Review and Report.

Collated annually (at the end of each municipal year)

Executive Response and follow-up review

Howard Boots

Percentage of recommendations accepted by the Executive in 2006/7 = 100%

Percentage of recommendations put into practice, as verified by a Follow-up Review in 2006/7 = 97%

The percentage of Scrutiny Panel members who feel that Tameside Scrutiny Panels add value to the services that they review and that they are engaged with the scrutiny process.

Collated annually (at the end of each municipal year)

Annual customer survey of all our Scrutiny Panel Members

Howard Boots

94% of Scrutiny Panel members feel that Scrutiny Panels add value to the services they review whilst 75% feel that they are engaged with the scrutiny process

The percentage of Scrutiny Panel members (either councillors or co-opted) who attended meetings of Scrutiny Panels.

Collated annually (at the end of each municipal year)

This information is collected at each Panel meeting, but will be collated annually (at the end of each municipal year)

Principal Scrutiny Support and Co-ordination Officers

 66.5% for the municipal year 2006-07 up from 55.75% in 2005-06

The percentage of people on the Tameside Citizens' Panel who indicate that they have an awareness and understanding of scrutiny in Tameside.

Annually

Using the Tameside Citizen's Panel survey

Howard Boots

The results of the 2006 survey (published January 2007) show that 40% of respondents had heard of Scrutiny Panels (up from 32% in 2006). Of these 54% felt that they were fully or partly aware of what the Scrutiny Panels do (a decrease from 61% in 2006).